Accreditation outcomes 2010-2015: which programmes fall short of expectations and why

Namepaper-5_sin_tavares_amaral.pdf
Size0.6 MB
Downloads104
Year2015
Author(s)Cristina Sin, Orlanda Tavares, Alberto Amaral
Abstract
The paper analyses the main outcomes of programme accreditation in Portugal further to the operations of the Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education, which were initiated in 2009. Tracking the evolution of study programmes, the paper found that out of the initial 5262 programmes on offer in 2009/10, 40% have been either discontinued or not accredited as of July 2015. The analysis revealed differences between the private and the public sector, with higher proportions of closure in the former. It also revealed differences by disciplinary area. For Law, the discipline with highest percentage of non-accredited programmes, the main reason for non-accreditation resided in the programmes’ lack of compliance with legal requirements regarding teaching staff qualifications and full-time employment. The blurred identity of programmes, undifferentiated between university and polytechnic sectors, and curricular incoherence were other important reasons for non-accreditation.
CategoriesQuality of HE » 2015 10th EQAF